Why Wisconsin Matters

February 24, 2011

Filed under: Politics — Tags: — jonathanpoisner @ 9:45 am

What’s happening today in Wisconsin and a few other states matters.   A lot.

Taking away the rights of public employees to collectively bargain and form effective unions represents a threat to our freedom.

The big battle for freedom in America today isn’t between citizens and so-called “Big Government,” as the right wing would have us believe. It’s between citizens and corporations.

(By corporations, I’m not referring to small businesses — heck I’m incorporated myself; I’m referring to large corporations publicly traded that have zero allegiance to anything except the singular goal of maximizing shareholder value).

Yes, government takes some of our income as taxes and places some limits on our behavior through laws.

But corporations limit our freedom in many more profound ways.   And they’d limit our freedom far more if not for government as a tool citizens use to fight back.

Corporations thrive by making us dependent on them.  And we are – for our health, our sustenance, our housing, and many other necessities.  It’s impossible to live in America today and not transact with corporations literally dozens of times per day.

We are rarely in a position to bargain with corporations; almost always we must accept their terms.

Aside from limiting our freedom when we buy, corporations limit our freedom in many other ways.

Corporations limit freedom when they pump poisons into our air and water, thus limiting our ability to safely breathe the air and drink the water.  If not for government enforcing clean water and clean air rules, our freedom would be limited to a far greater degree.

Corporations limit freedom when they charge obscene amounts for basic health care and use all sorts of underhanded tactics to remove sick people from health insurance coverage after taking their money.  I have a friend who is still paying off medical bills more than a decade after a major illness, when he lived briefly without health insurance because his employer had him under contract instead of permanent employment.

Corporations limit freedom when they prey on desperate people, charging usurious rates of interest short-term loans.

Let there be no mistake – the battle over whether public employees can unionize is really part of a much larger battle over whether and how individual citizens can band together via unions or any other type of institution to seek redress from government and corporations.

If states like Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, and other states with long union traditions strip away the rights of public employees, it will mark an acceleration in the decline of America’s middle class and a significant weakening of our ability to fight back.

So if I were in Wisconsin today, I’d be at the rallies.  And perhaps even more, I’d be raising money and preparing for an epic election in the year or two ahead.

And when it comes down to it, we’re all in Wisconsin when it comes to this battle.

The November 2012 general election is just 621 days away.   There’s no time to waste.

Be Sociable, Share!

When strategy is left out of strategic planning

February 23, 2011

Filed under: Strategic Planning — Tags: — jonathanpoisner @ 4:38 pm

I’ve recently had a chance to read some strategic plans that seem to be missing a critical piece: strategy.

They have mission statements, vision, goals, and tactics.  But what’s missing is anything in writing making the case that the tactics or programs they’re projecting to do will lead to accomplishing the goals (or outcomes) they hope to achieve .

To be sure, my guess is that if you queried these organizations, staff and board members could probably make explicit the implicit assumptions in their plans.

But I say “write it down.”  Make it explicit and put it into the plan, if only for the benefit of future board members and staff members who were not part of the “retreat” where decisions were made.

Aside from the benefit to future organizational leaders, my experience is that in some cases, many of the disagreements organizations face during planning retreats stem from underlying disagreements about these strategic assumptions that lay behind the thinking of individual retreat participants.

Without making these assumptions explicit, it’s easier for people to talk past each other.   You wind up getting stuck and resorting to dots on a butcher block paper or some other exercise (many of which are useful in some contexts) to get people to vote, but without achieve a true consensus about what you’re going to do and, perhaps as importantly, why you’re going to do it.

If you don’t achieve consensus on the “why” part, you’re much more likely to have disagreements down the road when things don’t go as planned and your staff and board must adjust their work plans.

Be Sociable, Share!

Great study on citizen to Congress communication

February 4, 2011

Filed under: Advocacy,Communications — Tags: , , — jonathanpoisner @ 8:32 am

Great study showing how Congressional staff rate different forms of communications as a means to influence members of Congress.

The bottom line: personal is king, and content is more important than volume.

http://bit.ly/hjhsI2

Be Sociable, Share!

Content © Copyright 2010-2013 • Jonathan Poisner Strategic Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.