Needs versus budget fundraising

September 10, 2025

Filed under: Fundraising — jonathanpoisner @ 2:34 pm

Another consultant recently reminded me of a concept that’s been implicit in fundraising materials I’ve generated for clients, but that I’ve never written about.

The concept: the needs you present donors don’t have to match the budget you use for fiscal management.  Indeed, if you’re only presenting your actual budget to funders, you’re setting yourself up for reduced impact.

This can be confusing because foundation funders nearly always ask for your adopted budget, so that becomes the default that many nonprofit leaders think individuals will want to see with fundraising.

To understand why that hamstrings you, let’s review what goes into a nonprofit budget.

The budget should be adopted annually by your board and should identify the revenue you’re seeking to achieve in the upcoming fiscal year, along with expenses.  Both revenue and expenses should be broken down by categories to allow for a reasonable understanding of the major sources of revenue you’ll receive, along with the various ways you spend money. 

Here’s the important part: the budget is a tool for the board to exercise its fiduciary duty and ensure that the organization is being prudent with how it spends money.  If it spends more than it receives on an ongoing basis, this could lead to a cash flow crunch, inability to meet payroll, and other significant challenges. 

Note: I deliberately inserted the words “ongoing basis” into the above paragraph.  In any given year, you may very well adopt a budget that spends more than you raise if you’re entering the fiscal year with a more than adequate reserve.  And in other years, you may well adopt a budget to raise more than you spend, particularly if you’re hoping to build up a reserve fund or save for some really big future expense.

So why shouldn’t you present to donors the revenue targets in your budget and call that your need?

Two reasons.

Reason one is the simplest and least important: timing.  Your budget is for a fiscal year, but you’ll be talking to many donors late in a fiscal year, before the next budget is adopted.  You need to be able to articulate needs for the subsequent fiscal year.

Reason two is the crux of the matter:  if you want to inspire big, investment level gifts, you need to be able to articulate the actual needs you have to grow your capacity to significantly advance your mission.  Big audacious goals are more likely to generate big audacious gifts. Yet, budgeting for big and audacious isn’t prudent.

How does this play out in practice? 

With one of my clients, we created and regularly updated a “Funding Needs” document that was two pages long.  The initial two-thirds of a page provided context (the organization’s mission, leadership, and core strategy).  The remainder laid out major areas of expenses that need to be incurred to achieve greater impact.  Big, round numbers were used that covered the needed expenses over a 3 year period.  These covered both major, new projects/activities and ongoing needs, including general operating expenses.

We shared this document broadly with potential/current funders, individual major donors, and stakeholders. Occasionally this led to some restricted gifts, particularly from foundations (and in one case an individual) interested in one specific need articulated. But overall, those shared this document in many instances made large, new, unrestricted gifts. This was true both for foundations and individuals.

Of course, some Executive Directors are nervous about projecting out activities/expenses before the board has authorized them in the form of budgets.  Indeed, a Funding Needs document shouldn’t identify any major new area of expense that hasn’t been discussed with the board.  But that discussion can come in the form of strategic planning or some other discussion about long-term needs.

The 2-pager approach described above is just one way of accomplishing this outcome.  You could create something longer and fancier.  Or use this approach on a more ad hoc basis.

But bottom line:  to inspire big gifts, focus on the dollars needed to significantly advance (or achieve) your mission, over a 2-4 year period.  Don’t just ask donors to help you hit your budget targets.

Be Sociable, Share!

After the ask

September 8, 2025

Filed under: Fundraising — jonathanpoisner @ 12:00 pm

I devote an entire chapter of the Essential Major Donor Toolkit to the ask meeting.  How do you structure the meeting?  What stories do you tell and in what order?  And how to make the ask itself, along with what comes after the ask.

Here’s a quick primer on what comes after the ask:

Immediately after the ask:  Stop talking.  You asked a question.  Let them answer it.  If you start talking again to cover up your own nerves, you can get sidetracked or actually decrease the odds of a donation of the amount requested.

If the donors says maybe:  If the donor says, “I’m not sure” or “I have to think about it” or any of a dozen maybe variants:

“Thanks so much for considering a donation.”

Then ask an open-ended question.  Get them talking so you can understand what they’re thinking.  Possible questions:

  • What do you think of our plans?
  • What do you like best about our work?
  • What more do you think we should be doing?

On more than one occasion when I did this the donor became a yes in answering the question and I walked away with a check.  They needed time to think, but the time could be just a minute or two and they could emotionally and mentally process while they were talking about the organization.

Of course, that usually doesn’t happen.  So you should then say something appropriate riffing off their answer and bringing it back to your own case/story that speaks to their priorities/interests. 

And then if it seems promising based on their answer to your open-ended question: re-ask for your original dollar request (or perhaps a smaller request if that seems more appropriate). 

Example: “I’m so glad to hear you’re excited about our PROGRAM/ACTIVITY. Our ability to plan and implement that work over the next few months goes up as we get more donations and pledges.  Is a DONATION AMOUNT gift something you can do this year?

Of course, if they say that they need more time at this point, don’t ask a third time during the meeting.

“I really appreciate your taking some time to think about making a significant donation this year. Can I circle back in a week to see what you’ve decided?”

Giving a firm timeline to circle back is important so that you’re not left with the awkwardness of not knowing how quickly to get back to them.

If the donor says yes:  Thank them and then work out the timeline for their gift.

Example: “Thanks so much!  I really appreciate your stepping up so we can have a bigger impact.  Would you like to make the donation via check today or would you prefer to mail a check or give in some other way?”

If they’re going to send it later/go online: “Can we count on your donation by the end of the month?” (Or “end of next week” if the ask is taking place near the end of the month).

If the donor says no: “Thanks so much for taking the time to meet with me.  I appreciate you have other priorities right now.”

Then try to figure out if this is a firm no or a “not now.”

“Would you like me to follow up in 6 months to see if your priorities line up at that point with our needs?”

Or: “Would you be open to discussing a gift in the future?  If so, when would be a good time to circle back to you?”

For everyone:

Regardless of whether you’ve had a maybe, yes, or no, ask:

“Do you have any friends or colleagues who you think would be interested in investing in our work?  And, if so, would you be willing to send an introductory email or text for me?”

Closing out the meeting

Thank them for their time if a “no.”

Thank them for their “consideration” if a maybe.

“Thanks again for your donation” if a yes.

Be Sociable, Share!

16 tips for getting fundraising meetings – UPDATED

July 9, 2025

Filed under: Fundraising — jonathanpoisner @ 3:53 am

I originally created 12 Tips back in 2013.  Here’s an expanded and updated set of 16 Tips. 

One of the biggest keys to successful fundraising is asking people in a meeting for money.

Events, letter, phone calls, and emails all belong as part of a robust, comprehensive fundraising system.  But thriving organizations almost always find that one-on-one solicitations are where they secure most of their unrestricted funds.

Many fundraisers I train believe that making the ask at the meeting is the easy part – where they profess to get held up is in getting the meeting in the first place.

Here’s sixteen tips for how to get the meeting

1. Make sure you’re working connections and not cold prospects.  If they’re not current donors, you should focus on people you know, or having someone who knows the donor connect you (either by making the meeting request directly or at least letting you use their name).  If you’re counting on your board to supply connections and they’re not being helpful, find others who will be (from existing donors, allies, don’t be shy in asking for help).  

2. Make the request via phone.  It’s too easy to duck an email and in an email you can’t engage people, motivate them, and respond to any misapprehensions they might have about the meeting.  If you don’t have their phone number, there are still ways to look up people’s number just as in the old days of the white pages.  (Don’t have phone numbers, check out tip 16).     

3. Be persistent without being a pest.  You will often have to try to call a donor a dozen times before getting a meeting request in, especially with people are increasingly not answering their phone.  So script out a really compelling short voicemail message that ends with the bottom line: I’ll to reach you again next week. This increases the odds they’ll pick up the phone when you call again.   Just keep trying at different times and dates.

4. Start the process far in advance of when you really need the meeting to happen.  If you need the ask to take place in November, start requesting the meeting in October.  The further out you set a proposed date, the less likelihood that conflicts will get in the way.  Or, if you ask for a time 10 days out and they say they are already booked, it gives you an easy (and hard to refuse) follow-up ask for a later time when they’re not booked.

5. If they say it’s a bad time to talk, ask if you can call back “in an hour” or “tomorrow.”

6. Start by thanking them if at possible.  For past donations.  For past volunteer work.   For some other community work they’ve done even if not for your organization.

7. Be passionate and upbeat.  Passion is contagious and people are more likely to want to spend time with someone if they perceive you as upbeat.  You are selling yourself as much as the organization in trying to set up the meeting.

8. If it’s geographically appropriate, tell them you’re going to be in their area.  Some donors are reluctant to have you make a special visit just for them.  But if they think you’re already in the area, they’re more willing to meet. 

9. Make clear you’re looking both for their input and to see how they can help.  Propose some topic where you’re seeking input (your upcoming or new strategic plan, your communications, ideas, some specific organizational issue, etc.).

10. Create some time-urgency.   Mention something you hope to do in 2-4 months and the impact it will have and that you’re talking to supporters so that you’re in a position to move forward at full capacity. 

11. Propose a specific date and time.  Don’t ask: “Can we meet?”  Ask: “Are you free to meet on Tuesday the 22nd at 3 p.m.?”   Assume they want to meet.  Wouldn’t anybody want to meet you?  Get them focused on the where/when.  

12. Focus on their convenience, not yours.  Always offer first to meet them at their home, office, or a nearby coffee shop or restaurant.  Let them choose.  Be willing to meet early in the morning, just after work, or during the evening.  If they say they’d like to meet via zoom, that’s not a bad option compared to no meeting, but make at least one attempt to gently push them into an in-person option.  

13. Be prepared to pivot back to a second ask for a meeting if they initially say no.  In my experience, nearly half of the eventual meetings I got involved a donor prospect initially saying something like: “I’m too busy” or “Don’t waste your time with me, I’ll donate regardless.” 

14. Use peer pressure.  If you know they’re friends/colleagues/rivals of someone else who you’ve met with or are meeting with, figure out how to drop that into the conversation.

15. If they say something that divulges something personal (e.g. I’m going to my son’s wedding”), don’t be afraid to follow up with a question designed to make the relationship more personal (e.g. “Congratulations!  Where is he getting married?”  You should be genuinely interested in them as a person, not just a checkbook.

16. Lastly, if you don’t have phone numbers for a donor, consider ways to obtain it.  The free way: If you know of a board member or person close to the organization who likely has it, don’t be shy to ask.  The paid ways: If your organization subscribes to a Wealth Screening service via your donor database, those often come with a data append function that will provide phone numbers.  Alternatively, WhitePages.Com is a relatively affordable (on a monthly basis) way to put in a name and physical address and get information about the person, including phone number.  You may be able to subscribe for just a couple months to fill in phone numbers for your top donor prospects and then let your subscription lapse. 

Have your own tip with something that’s worked for you?  Please share your ideas!

Be Sociable, Share!

Selling without Overselling

June 30, 2025

Filed under: Communications,Fundraising,Online Communications — jonathanpoisner @ 10:59 am

I was recently talking with a former Executive Director whose organization thrived under their leadership.

I’ve been thinking a lot about one of their comments.

Their comment: “In promoting their organization to funders, allies, stakeholders, and others, they were always trying to find the balance between selling and overselling.”

What did they mean by that?

If you fail to “sell,” you’re organization is going to flounder.  The nonprofit space is crowded and people need to be motivated in some way to take actions you want (whether it’s offering direct financial support, volunteer energy, or some other action).

Yet, if you “oversell,” you can overstate your organization’s role in events, particularly when your work is done in coordination of some form with other nonprofits.  You may secure funds this way in the short-term, but there’s a high risk of this boomeranging against you over the long run as the truth emerges.

I’ve personally seen an organization go from solid to in trouble because a new Executive Director “oversold” to key funders and those funders lost faith when the organization didn’t deliver and the word got back to the funders that the organization was taking credit for coalition work that was outsized for their role.

So how do you know if you’re finding the balance between selling and overselling.  Or perhaps worst of all, not selling at all.

Here are some techniques for finding the right balance.

Evidence that You’re Not Selling Enough

While not the focus of the comment that prompted my thinking, I’ve seen Executive Directors reluctant to tout their organization and unwilling to sell.

Of course, some object to the word “selling” when it comes to nonprofits.  In their view, nonprofits aren’t a commercial endeavor. 

I disagree.  Nonprofits are selling impact – something they’re doing in the world that the donor wants and is willing to contribute towards achieving. You are in the business of connecting people’s values with your organization’s mission.  In the process, you’re both making the impact they desire and helping them feel good about themselves.

But what about the “sales” part?  It’s not just about marketing – building the brand so to speak.  You also need to sell:  to get to that point in the conversation you’re having with potential donors where you “ask” and they say yes (or no).

Warning signs you’re not selling enough?

  • You don’t celebrate/communicate your successes and tout the impact you’re going to have with further donations.
  • You’re not willing to stand out from the crowd.  I recently discussed with an organization that was clearly the leading group for a geographic area when it came to an issue, but they balked at describing themselves that way, preferring to say “one of the leading organizations.” I believe their fundraising is suffering because they’re unwillingness to toot their own horn.
  • You meet with donors and don’t make an ask or just generally say: “we hope you’ll contribute.” You’re a salesperson, not just a marketer.

Evidence You’re Selling Too Much

Of course, overselling is also something I’ve seen repeatedly among nonprofits. Sometimes this is based on a charismatic leader who sells themself as much as the nonprofit and its impact.

Those who oversell risk coming across as inauthentic and losing the trust of supporters.

So how do you know if you’re overselling?

  • If you’re prone to exaggerating your claims of success and justify doing so by saying, “everyone does it.”
  • If more than 25% of your communications with supporters represents an “ask.”   (Use the 80-20 rule — 4 communications that are not about donations for every “ask”).
  • If your social media churn and email list attrition is greater than typical for the nonprofit world.  (Check out the M&R benchmarks for some evidence on that front).

You may want to bring in a third party to help review whether you’re overselling.

  • Do a brand audit, looking at your communications and fundraising materials.  Somebody taking a fresh look can help.
  • Use strategic planning (or some other hook) as a reason for having a neutral party confidentially interview the organizations with which you are most frequently collaborating. If you have a reputation for taking more credit than deserved within coalitions, it will likely come out in the interviews.

Finding the Sweet Spot

Presumably, if you’re selling enough, and not overselling, you’ve found the sweet spot.

You’re authentically communicating in a positive way about your impact, taking credit for who you are and what you’re accomplishing.

Donors and supporters respond accordingly.

Relationships are strengthened.

Jim Collins, in his monograph, Good to Great and the Social Sector, talks about organizations that find the sweet spot in a Venn diagram where they are the best at something, they are passionate about something, and there is a resource engine (e.g. donors who’re interested/excited to help, or some other financing method). 

With that in mind, my final recommendation:

  • Find your passion and don’t be afraid to show it!
  • Be the best at something and let people know it!
  • Authentically communicate with your potential supporters, building relationships based on trust where you tout your successes without exaggerating them.
  • And don’t forget to make the ask.

Be Sociable, Share!

A Donor Prospect Identification Exercise

May 27, 2025

Filed under: Board Development,Fundraising — jonathanpoisner @ 3:32 pm

A common refrain I hear when talking to nonprofit boards (and often staff) is that “I/we don’t know anybody who could be a major donor.”

Now if their definition of a major donor is too ambitious, this might be true. The universe of $100,000+ donors is small.

At the same time, the universe of donors who can and will give at the $10,000 level is larger than most people realize. And that’s true and then some with regard to donors at the $1,000+ level. At least for most my clients, anybody giving $1,000+ is a “major” donor.

Yet, even then, the complaint continues: “I don’t know anybody who can give $1,000.”

While this is sometimes true, it’s more often true that they can’t recall off the top of their head the people they know who can give at that level.

Working with various clients, I’ve found that running board and staff through an exercise focused on prospect identification often surfaces new, legitimate prospects to pursue.

Some context — the A, B, C test

Your major donor list should start with existing donors, board members who left on good standing, volunteers, etc.

In thinking about potential donors who don’t fit any of those categories, I was taught the A, B, C test.

  • A = Ability – do they have the income or assets that would allow them to make a donation at the designated level?
  • B = Belief – do they believe in the organization or, the more general “cause” or “impact” that the organization is working to advance via its mission?
  • C = Connection (or Contact) – does somebody in the organization know them at least at the level of acquaintance?

The biggest hang up for many people is when it comes to Ability — they believe only a tiny fraction of Americans donate at the $1,000 level. In reality, I’ve seen estimates showing that more than half of American families donate to charity in any given year and 10% of those say they’ve donated more than $1,000. So that’s 1 in 20 overall.

This may seem like a small percentage, but given that the average person knows hundreds of people, that leaves a sizeable number (on average) that you’re likely to know. Most people know at least one.

This obviously will vary by geography, age, economic situation, and other factors, but bottom line: most people underestimate the level of generosity that their friends (and acquaintances) display.

An exercise

The compounding factor is that many organizations ask “who do you know who could be a major donor” as an abstract question that asks people to rack their brains.

Instead, an exercise is warranted.

  • Provide people a short 10 minute overview of charitable giving.
  • Ask them to take 10-30 minutes on their own scanning through their email address book, their social media account friends/followers, their cell phone contact list, and any old-fashioned rolodex.
  • If this is a collective exercise, as they identify somebody, have them shout out the name. On more than one occasion, I’ve experienced somebody else in the group immediately both recognizing the name AND having that prompt some other name to come to their mind.
  • Don’t call it done when people have scanned their lists. They may have passed over names in haste or more likely there are people they know not included.
  • Ask them a series of questions:

Who in their family (extended) may have the ability and belief?

Are they part of a religious institution and do they know others through that with the likely ability and belief?

Are they a member of any club or regular activity and who from those would have the likely ability and belief? — I once had this exercise cause somebody to remember some people in their book club that they had neglected to consider.

Do they know people through participation in sports (active or as spectators/watchers) who would have the ability and belief? – I once had somebody remember somebody from their fantasy football league when prompted in this way.

Who do they know via employment, such as co-workers (current or former) or via professional networks – I once had somebody remember that a former co-worker had retired with some degree of wealth and had spoken with passion of the cause the organization addressed.

Getting people to ask

Of course, creating a strong prospect list is only valuable if people are willing to network with, cultivate where necessary, and make asks. That’s worthy of a different article. For now, recognize that your team almost certainly knows more potential donors than you realize if you’re prepared to be systematic in working with the team.

Be Sociable, Share!

On Fundraising Stories

April 16, 2025

Filed under: Communications,Fundraising,Online Communications — jonathanpoisner @ 12:11 pm

I often talk about the importance of shifting fundraising language from a bullet-point approach to a story approach.

I know that for some nonprofit leaders this is challenging because storytelling isn’t their natural inclination. It’s not mine either.

Yet, by taking into account some basic techniques, virtually anybody can generate effective fundraising stories.

A more complete primer on fundraising stories can be found in my E-Book, the Essential Major Donor Toolkit. 

For those getting started, here’s a handful of important things to bear in mind when trying to craft a fundraising story. 

Include all the Elements of a Story

In crafting fundraising stories, ensure they have all three elements of a story.

  1. An objective.  The objective could be a community need or the need of individuals within it. 

  2. An obstacle.  The obstacle could be bad policy, lack of funding, natural causes, or some other threat or barrier that keeps the community (or individuals within it) from achieving their objective.  

  3. Impact.  There needs to be either harm if the objective isn’t overcome and/or some positive impact if the objective is overcome.  These are the stakes.  They don’t have to be huge stakes, but they must be clearly articulated in a way that the donor will find important.

Every story you’ve ever read – not just fundraising stories –have all these elements.  Don’t just talk about community need.  Don’t just talk about obstacles.  Don’t just talk about impact.  Make sure all three show up. 

Incomplete and Complete Stories

Make sure you are crafting both complete and incomplete stories.

A complete story is backwards looking and shows how you have made an impact in the past.  Complete stories are an important way to demonstrate to donors that their past support has translated into the charitable impact they desire and thus a good bet for future donations.      

An incomplete story is one where the outcome is not yet known and, importantly, one where the donor can make a difference by helping the organization have future impact.  Incomplete stories are essential to create urgency and to ramp up the emotional stakes.

In writing any story, ask yourself: am I writing this to demonstrate past impact or am I writing this to create urgency so donors will want to give right now.

In writing the set of stories that may go into your fundraising, make sure you have some of both type.

Put the Donor in the Stories

Too often I read fundraising appeals that talk about all the great things “we” did as an organization.

As you write/edit your stories, use the word “you” instead of “we” whenever possible.

You want donors to feel like they’re a hero making an impact and that means making them central to the appeal.  “Your support ensures IMPACT.”  “You can help IMPACT.” 

The word “you” should show up in both completed stories where the donor had a role in the organization’s past impact, and incomplete stories where the donor can be the hero.

Where possible with the technology, you can also insert their name into appeals.

* * * * *

Want to run a fundraising letter or email by me for a quick reaction, I offer all nonprofits a free half hour consultation.  Just reach out if interested.

Be Sociable, Share!

Preparing for a Likely Recession

February 27, 2025

Filed under: Board Development,Fundraising,Strategic Planning — jonathanpoisner @ 1:45 pm

February 2025

Preparing for a Likely Recession

No, I’m not an economist (although I do have a B.S. in Economics). 

A lot of smart people – including economists — thought there’d be a recession 2 years go and there wasn’t.

And the same thing the year before that.   And a few years before that.

You get the gist.   In any given year, somebody is predicting a recession.

Of course, this year, between the federal chaos/layoffs, tariffs, and general economic uncertainty created by businesses unwilling to invest under a unpredictable regime, it’s hard not to believe that the long overdue recession will finally come.

It doesn’t mean the end of your nonprofit.  Indeed, you may actually thrive during the recession.

I managed the Oregon League of Conservation Voters through the 2001-2002 recession and the first half of the 2008-2010 “great” recession. 

Having managed a nonprofit through these, what do I wish I’d done differently in the 6 months prior to them?

Here are six ideas of what to do and one of what not to do.  Some of these lessons are directly based on my experience at OLCV and others are based on my knowledge as a consultant.

  1. Pay attention to your cash reserve.  If you haven’t already, have a conversation with your board up-front about what level they are willing to let that reserve drop to during a recession.  It’s okay – indeed, it’s appropriate — to have an annual loss during a recession if you began the year with a large enough reserve.  Have this conversation openly with your board rather than making decisions on the fly

  2. Be open with staff about your financial situation.  Are you in a really solid position?  Or somewhat precarious?  At OLCV, I wasn’t always open with my staff about how tight our finances were leading up to the 2001-2002 recession.  When a difficult decision was made by the Board Executive Committee (with my support), to freeze all staff salaries (e.g. no pay raises during the year, even COLAs), there was some staff frustration.  If I’d done more in the year prior to educate staff about how thin our reserve was, I would’ve saved heartache later on.

  3. Think about delaying “icing” expenditures.  Some of what you do is the cake.  It’s what you absolutely need to do to advance your mission.  Other things are nice, but if you don’t do them, nobody’s going to look at your nonprofit and say: you’re failing.  Take a hard pass through your budget/expenditures and ask: what can easily be deferred 6-12 months until we know more about our financial situation?  Ask staff their opinion about what to defer (or just cut).

  4. Don’t stop fundraising!  If anything, step it up.  Some people might say: “our donors are probably freaked out, so now’s not the time to ask.”  Don’t make that decision for them!  You never know their situation.  I once had a donor who I knew had been laid off make his largest ever gift to us.  (I learned later it was because he’d received an inheritance).   Even in bad recessions, plenty of people have jobs/situations that leave them doing well financially.  They are sometimes even happier to donate recognizing the need and their relative good fortune.

  5. In your fundraising, focus more of your energy on cultivating existing donors to deepen your relationships than adding first-time donors.  When individuals cut back their giving during a recession, they tend to stick with organizations they already support versus those that are new.

  6. Also in your fundraising: focus on your relationship with your top donors.  In most organization, there are 10-15 donors who make huge difference.  Be proactive in the next few months cultivating your relationships with them.  Let me know what you’re doing, how your reacting to the new lay of the land, and how their donations are making a difference.

  7. Lastly, a lesson of what to avoid: don’t choose a recession as the time to launch a business-focused fundraising effort.  Corporate fundraising yo-yos much further down during a recession historically, compared to individual giving or foundation philanthropy.  If you’ve laid the groundwork or you’re targeting businesses that are somewhat recession-proof, this might not apply to you.  But think hard about making a new, business-focused campaign an important part of our 2025-2026 strategy.

Do you have lessons of your own to share? Please leave them as a comment!

Be Sociable, Share!

Year-end fundraising tips

November 27, 2024

Filed under: Fundraising — jonathanpoisner @ 3:28 pm

November 27, 2024

Given we’re on the cups of December, I felt it would be timely to share some thoughts on year-end fundraising.  Of course, in the ideal world, you would have finished planning for your year-end giving campaign earlier.  But it’s not too late to gin up a year-end campaign that builds upon your past successes.

So here are six key suggestions for you to consider when it comes to year-end fundraising:

1. Don’t just make one effort and call it done

People are incredibly generous in December.  I’ve read various statistics, but roughly one-third of all nonprofit donations come in during the month.  And as much as 10% comes in during the final couple of days of the year.

If your organization has the capacity, you should send out a letter to past donors (and prospective) asking for a gift.

Again, if capacity allows, you should individually follow up via phone or text with those you can (starting with those with the highest level of past giving assuming you have limited capacity).

Of course, for your very top donors, you should be trying to meet with them in-person if they’re interested as that’s the most effective way to build relationships.

Your email campaign should also not just be a one-off.  Ideally, you’d kick off the month with an email about your year-end campaign (perhaps focused on Giving Tuesday), follow-up mid-month with a progress/update, and finish it off on the 29th or 30th to spur those final end-of-year donations.

Layer in social media with an overlapping message.  And again, not just one.  Time at least some social media to go out the same day as your emails. Sometimes the first message piques their interest and the second spurs them to action.

For each separate social media channel where you are active, think 2-3 posts early in December launching your year-end giving, 3-4 mid-month, and a final burst of 4-6 between Christmas and New Years.

2. Make it an integrated campaign

You’re not coming up with a dozen different fundraising appeals for all the mail/email above.  You have one over-arching campaign, with a goal/theme, and you should repeat that across every appeal/channel.

Obviously, you’re not repeating word for word. Email will be shorter and use simpler language than mail, for example.

But your early December messaging should announce the year-end campaign, your mid-December message should report some early progress, and your end-of-month messaging should get people excited about the campaign’s success.

What that central goal/theme looks like will vary wildly by organization. While you’re thinking of this as a campaign, I don’t recommend pitching the dollars for a specific organizational activity, as end-of-year giving is a prime opportunity to generate general operating revenue that provides you the maximum flexibility.

3. Make your donor the hero of the story

Think you not we.

You want your donors (and prospective donors) to feel celebrated and important, to understand the appeal/importance of your mission, and to feel part of the team.  You want them to feel “super” like they have a “super power.”

For example, don’t talk about what “we” have accomplished. Talk about what “you” have accomplished.

Bonus points if you can make the story unfinished, so the donor’s continued generosity is key.  Or have a clear sequel story that you gin up as part of the ask for the “next story.”

4. Prime your best folks to further spread the word

You have your lists and social media reach and they get you so far.

But messages from you will have more power when reinforced by individuals who the donor knows.

Reach out to your board members and any key volunteers letting them know to expect the year-end fundraising email(s) and ask them to forward/share them (preferably more than one of them).

Consider directly messaging them on social media (if they’re on your channel) making the same request as you make posts.

This takes time, of course, but can both increase the odds donors respond and allow you to reach new donors from the networks of your board/volunteers.

5. Offer a match (if you can)

Especially for email, evidence shows a match can be motivating to some donors and increase the number of responses and the average gift. 

Of course, you can overemphasize a match. It needs to be part of the appeal — the shiny icing on the cake — not the cake itself.  

But to the extent you have a single donor (or an array of donors together) who can offer a match that’s large enough to seem motivating, you should do so. After all, cake icing is yummy.

I would not necessarily feature the match in every message.  I’d do so more at the beginning of the campaign and again at the end if you haven’t already secured the match.

6. Segment

Don’t treat all your donors the same.

To the extent you can, you should remove those you’re targeting with large individual asks from your mass emails and general mailings.  Perhaps include them in the final year-end emails if they haven’t given.

With mail, if you can produce two letters – one for those who haven’t given recently and one for those whose support you want to renew, that’s preferable to one message covering both.  The letter is mostly the same, but at a few key points your ask language would differ. You can, of course, take this further and segment past donors into different tiers who get letters that mention slightly varied asked for donation amounts.

Likewise, with email, if your email list is synced to your fundraising database in a way that allows you to distinguish past donors from prospective, I would again recommend a slightly different message to the two lists.

Bonus: Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good

Don’t read the tips above and get overwhelmed if you’re starting from scratch. Better to do a few of these than none. Pick those doable within your time and technology.

Then start planning earlier next year and see what more is feasible.

Be Sociable, Share!

Scary Nonprofit Quotes 2024

October 24, 2024

Welcome to the 3rd not-quite annual edition of Scary Nonprofit Quotes.

I authored the original edition in 2021 as Halloween approached and a follow-up in 2022.  After a one-year hiatus, I’m back.

I’ve wracked my brain and reviewed notes from the year. So without further adieu, here are the scariest things I’ve heard uttered by nonprofit leaders during the last couple of years.  Some of these may seem made up, but they’re not!

If you have a scary quote of your own, please add them as comments!

Scary Quotes, 2024 Edition

  1. I knew 10 years ago our fundraising database was a mess and needed to be replaced, but it just never seemed like the right time.

  2. I know this is what most of the people we had you interview said, but I don’t think they get nonprofits.  (Note: the people interviewed actually had more nonprofit experience than the board chair who uttered this].

  3. I can’t continue to be board chair of this organization unless the organization starts paying me as a contractor.

  4. I don’t believe we should work with deadlines or agreed upon objectives. 

  5. I don’t use talking points or write up what I’m going to say at our fundraising events. I prefer to wing it.   I’m not sure I could tell you what I said after the fact. 

  6. I know it’s a headache, but I’ll just leave that to the next Executive Director to deal with [after I leave in about 2 years].

  7. I don’t care if our board minutes are accurate.  Nobody will ever read them.

  8. I like to just use general topics for meeting agendas rather than specific questions.  I prefer to just let the meeting unfold.

  9. High staff turnover is something we just have to accept given we’re a nonprofit and therefore don’t pay well.

  10. I think I should be able to bring my wife to the board meeting. [notwithstanding the confidential information/topics that will be covered].

Let’s do a poll!  Please vote for your favorite Scary Quote of 2024.  I’ll be sure to post the results on Halloween. 

Please also comment if you have your own scary quotes you’d like to share!

Be Sociable, Share!

Nonprofit dashboards 101

May 30, 2024

Filed under: Board Development,Fundraising,Leadership,Strategic Planning — jonathanpoisner @ 11:41 am

The phrase “Nonprofit Dashboard” is not one I recall hearing in my first decade in the nonprofit sector (1994-2004).  Then, a few years into the new millennium, I started to hear the phrase occasionally.  By the early 2010s, I started to hear the phrase frequently.  

Dashboards have emerged as a tool for nonprofits because most organizations have far more data about their own performance than their counterparts two decades ago (or longer).  In addition, tools for graphically displaying data have become commonplace, embedded within programs we already use like Excel. 

But Dashboards aren’t something that are right for every nonprofit and doing them right requires serious thinking.

So what is a Nonprofit Dashboard

The term Dashboard is used because the tool is analogous to a car dashboard – a quick, comprehensive view of the overall status of the car.  In the organizational context, a Dashboard is usually a 1-3 page document, produced on a regular schedule, which uses a combination of tables, charts, and graphs to visually represent key metrics by which an organization is evaluating itself.  

While Dashboards can be focused solely on a specific program or other activity (e.g. fundraising), more often organizations develop Dashboards that are comprehensive with regards to their organization.

Why create a Dashboard? 

Do staff really need one more report on their to-do list?

Dashboards can serve many purposes, but the three most common benefits Dashboard proponents cite are: 

  • It generates strategic thinking about how the organization measures success.
  • It can help to identify on a timely basis where an organization is being successful and where things may be going off course.
  • It can provide a useful tool by which to focus the attention of the board on the most important things.

For really small organizations just struggling to hire their first few staff, a Dashboard is probably overkill.  But at some point Dashboards become worth the investment.

What should a Dashboard measure?  

There are many terms bandied about, but the one I like is Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).  “Key” because you have to pick and choose since there are many metrics that matter to an organization and the challenge is to pick out a reasonable subset of them that are most important.  “Performance Indicators” because you’re measuring something that’s an indicator of success.

How do you choose your KPIs? 

If at all possible, the search for KPIs should begin with an organizational strategic plan, which should already identify goals and measurements of success.  The challenge is to then pick which measurements are the most important to pay attention to in the next few years. 

If you don’t already have these, start with your programs and ask: Which are most important?  Some are more likely to be icing on the cake and others get at your core.  Focus on the core. 

For each program, what metrics are you already tracking (or can you reasonably track in the future) to evaluate your performance over time?   For some organizations these are straightforward.  A school may be tracking enrollment and learning (via test scores or grades).  A homeless shelter may track people served and homeless placed into permanent housing. 

For other organizations, particularly those engaged in advocacy, the search for meaningful program measurements can be more complex.  But every time I’ve engaged with an organization on this topic, we’ve come up with some outputs that are good indicators of progress, even if they don’t represent the ultimate outcomes being sought.

Leaving programs aside, nearly every Dashbaord I’ve seen also include multiple KPIs that focus on finances – mostly on the revenue side of the equation.  Here the challenge is to think through your revenue generating strategies and identify what matters most.  Overall revenue is obvious. Unrestricted funding is another good one. Or you may find it important to focus on fundraising metrics by major type of revenue (e.g. individuals, corporations, foundations, etc.).

With regard to fundraising from individuals, some metrics that may be important are: the number of individual donors (or members), retention rate for individual donors (how many who gave in the prior year, have given in this year), average gift levels, the percentage of donors who have upgraded in the last year, number of donors who’ve made a second gift, etc. 

Over several years, the list of which metrics you focus on may evolve – but at any given time you should look at your fundraising strategies and see what matters most. 

Sometimes no one metric seems right so you have to invent something that rolls up several data points into a new one.  For example, when I was Executive Director of the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, we developed a long-term communications plan where progress could be measured in dozens of different ways, no two or three of which seemed most important. 

Yet, in the end, we knew that what we really wanted out of our communications was for our constituents to take action.  So we created a new metric which we called “Total Actions” taken in response to our communications.  Each quarter we added up all sorts of actions people took in response to our online communications, such as clicking on links, forwarding emails, donations, downloading documents, social media shares, etc.  As long as Total Actions was on a solid upward trajectory, we knew we were making progress.

Of course, having good fundraising and/or communications data for your Dashboard presumes you’re using a valid Constituent Relations Management (CRM) database to track donations, online communications, and other data necessary to produce the metrics.  If you’re still on Excel or hate your current database, getting past that hurdle should come before you create a Dashboard.

Likewise, the discussion about program metrics presumes that you have a means of tracking the outputs and outcomes from your programs and you put that data somewhere – whether in your fundraising CRM or in some separate data set. If you’re not pulling together data to evaluate individual programs, it will be hard to create a Dashboard.

The last question is: how do you display the data?

I’ve found that Excel is plenty powerful to take data and generate good charts and graphs for a good Dashboard.  Or sometimes, just putting the data into a Table and color coding rows as Green, Yellow, and Red based on whether you’re doing great, okay, or not well is sufficient.

If your own Excel skills are too limited, you probably can find a skilled volunteer who in just a few hours time can take data in a spreadsheet and display it in a useful manner in a way you can easily replicate every 3-6 months without ongoing assistance.

It’s worth investing some time/energy to get the Dashboard display right.  If you’ve done all the work to generate and select the data, you should absolutely make sure it’s presented to your board and senior staff in a format that aids comprehension.  

If you have an example of a Dashboard you’re willing to share with me, I’m always looking for more ideas for how to use them effectively.

Be Sociable, Share!

Content © Copyright 2010-2013 • Jonathan Poisner Strategic Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.